2.47
“Dvemā, bhikkhave, parisā. Katamā dve? Okkācitavinītā parisā nopaṭipucchāvinītā, paṭipucchāvinītā parisā nookkācitavinītā.
“Bhikkhus, there are these two kinds of assemblies. Which two? The assembly trained in empty talk but not trained in questioning, and the assembly trained in questioning but not trained in empty talk.
Katamā ca, bhikkhave, okkācitavinītā parisā nopaṭipucchāvinītā? Idha, bhikkhave, yassaṁ parisāyaṁ bhikkhū ye te suttantā tathāgatabhāsitā gambhīrā gambhīratthā lokuttarā suññatāpaṭisaṁyuttā tesu bhaññamānesu na sussūsanti na sotaṁ odahanti na aññā cittaṁ upaṭṭhapenti na ca te dhamme uggahetabbaṁ pariyāpuṇitabbaṁ maññanti. Ye pana te suttantā kavitā kāveyyā cittakkharā cittabyañjanā bāhirakā sāvakabhāsitā tesu bhaññamānesu sussūsanti sotaṁ odahanti aññā cittaṁ upaṭṭhapenti, te dhamme uggahetabbaṁ pariyāpuṇitabbaṁ maññanti, te ca taṁ dhammaṁ pariyāpuṇitvā na ceva aññamaññaṁ paṭipucchanti na ca paṭivicaranti: ‘idaṁ kathaṁ, imassa ko attho’ti? Te avivaṭañceva na vivaranti, anuttānīkatañca na uttānīkaronti, anekavihitesu ca kaṅkhāṭhāniyesu dhammesu kaṅkhaṁ na paṭivinodenti. Ayaṁ vuccati, bhikkhave, okkācitavinītā parisā no paṭipucchāvinītā.
And what, bhikkhus, is the assembly trained in empty talk but not trained in questioning? Here, in this kind of assembly, when those discourses spoken by the Tathāgata are being mentioned that are deep, profound in implication, world-transcending, connected with emptiness, the bhikkhus do not want to listen to them, do not lend an ear to them, or apply their minds to understand them; they do not think those teachings should be studied and learned. But when those discourses are being spoken that are mere poetry composed by poets, beautiful in words and phrases, ornate in expression, created by outsiders, spoken by disciples, then they do want to listen, lend an ear, and apply their minds to understand them, and they regard those teachings as worth studying and learning. Having learned them, they do not question one another or examine them thoroughly, [asking]: ‘How is this? What does this mean?’ They do not reveal what is unexplained or clarify what is obscure, and in regard to the many matters that arouse doubt, they do not dispel their doubts. This is called the assembly trained in empty talk but not trained in questioning.
Katamā ca, bhikkhave, paṭipucchāvinītā parisā nookkācitavinītā? Idha, bhikkhave, yassaṁ parisāyaṁ bhikkhū ye te suttantā kavitā kāveyyā cittakkharā cittabyañjanā bāhirakā sāvakabhāsitā tesu bhaññamānesu na sussūsanti na sotaṁ odahanti na aññā cittaṁ upaṭṭhapenti, na ca te dhamme uggahetabbaṁ pariyāpuṇitabbaṁ maññanti. Ye pana te suttantā tathāgatabhāsitā gambhīrā gambhīratthā lokuttarā suññatāpaṭisaṁyuttā tesu bhaññamānesu sussūsanti sotaṁ odahanti aññā cittaṁ upaṭṭhapenti, te ca dhamme uggahetabbaṁ pariyāpuṇitabbaṁ maññanti. Te taṁ dhammaṁ pariyāpuṇitvā aññamaññaṁ paṭipucchanti paṭivicaranti: ‘idaṁ kathaṁ, imassa ko attho’ti? Te avivaṭañceva vivaranti, anuttānīkatañca uttānīkaronti, anekavihitesu ca kaṅkhāṭhāniyesu dhammesu kaṅkhaṁ paṭivinodenti. Ayaṁ vuccati, bhikkhave, paṭipucchāvinītā parisā nookkācitavinītā. Imā kho, bhikkhave, dve parisā. Etadaggaṁ, bhikkhave, imāsaṁ dvinnaṁ parisānaṁ yadidaṁ paṭipucchāvinītā parisā nookkācitavinītā”ti.
And what, bhikkhus, is the assembly trained in questioning but not trained in empty talk? Here, in this kind of assembly, when those discourses are spoken that are mere poetry composed by poets, beautiful in words and phrases, ornate in expression, created by outsiders, spoken by disciples, the bhikkhus do not want to listen to them, do not lend an ear to them, or apply their minds to understand them; they do not think those teachings should be studied and learned. But when those discourses spoken by the Tathāgata are being mentioned that are deep, profound in implication, world-transcending, connected with emptiness, they do want to listen, lend an ear, and apply their minds to understand them, and they regard those teachings as worth studying and learning. Having learned them, they question one another and examine them thoroughly, [asking]: ‘How is this? What is the meaning of this?’ They reveal what is unexplained and clarify what is obscure, and with regard to the many matters that arouse doubt, they dispel their doubts. This is called the assembly trained in questioning but not trained in empty talk. These, bhikkhus, are the two kinds of assemblies. Of these two assemblies, the assembly trained in questioning but not trained in empty talk is the foremost.”