Reference Translation by Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0).
Sāvatthinidānaṁ.
At Sāvatthī.
“Kismiṁ nu kho, bhikkhave, sati, kiṁ upādāya, kiṁ abhinivissa attānudiṭṭhi uppajjatī”ti?
“Mendicants, when what exists, because of grasping what and insisting on what, does theory of self arise?”
Bhagavaṁmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā …pe…
“Our teachings are rooted in the Buddha. …”
“rūpe kho, bhikkhave, sati, rūpaṁ upādāya, rūpaṁ abhinivissa attānudiṭṭhi uppajjati.
“When form exists, because of grasping form and insisting on form, theory of self arises.
Vedanāya sati …
When feeling …
saññāya sati …
perception …
saṅkhāresu sati …
choices …
viññāṇe sati, viññāṇaṁ upādāya, viññāṇaṁ abhinivissa attānudiṭṭhi uppajjati.
consciousness exists, because of grasping consciousness and insisting on consciousness, theory of self arises.
Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave,
What do you think, mendicants?
rūpaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
Is form permanent or impermanent?”
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.” …
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ …pe…
api nu taṁ anupādāya attānudiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti?
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would theory of self arise?”
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“Vedanā …
“Is feeling …
saññā …
perception …
saṅkhārā …
choices …
viññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
consciousness permanent or impermanent?”
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.” …
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ …pe…
api nu taṁ anupādāya attānudiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti?
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would theory of self arise?”
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“Evaṁ passaṁ …pe…
“Seeing this …
nāparaṁ itthattāyāti pajānātī”ti.
They understand: ‘… there is nothing further for this place.’”
Sattamaṁ.
Reference Translation by Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0).
At Sāvatthī.
“Mendicants, when what exists, because of grasping what and insisting on what, does theory of self arise?”
“Our teachings are rooted in the Buddha. …”
“When form exists, because of grasping form and insisting on form, theory of self arises.
When feeling …
perception …
choices …
consciousness exists, because of grasping consciousness and insisting on consciousness, theory of self arises.
What do you think, mendicants?
Is form permanent or impermanent?”
“Impermanent, sir.” …
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would theory of self arise?”
“No, sir.”
“Is feeling …
perception …
choices …
consciousness permanent or impermanent?”
“Impermanent, sir.” …
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would theory of self arise?”
“No, sir.”
“Seeing this …
They understand: ‘… there is nothing further for this place.’”
Sāvatthinidānaṁ.
“Kismiṁ nu kho, bhikkhave, sati, kiṁ upādāya, kiṁ abhinivissa attānudiṭṭhi uppajjatī”ti?
Bhagavaṁmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā …pe…
“rūpe kho, bhikkhave, sati, rūpaṁ upādāya, rūpaṁ abhinivissa attānudiṭṭhi uppajjati.
Vedanāya sati …
saññāya sati …
saṅkhāresu sati …
viññāṇe sati, viññāṇaṁ upādāya, viññāṇaṁ abhinivissa attānudiṭṭhi uppajjati.
Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave,
rūpaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ …pe…
api nu taṁ anupādāya attānudiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti?
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“Vedanā …
saññā …
saṅkhārā …
viññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ …pe…
api nu taṁ anupādāya attānudiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti?
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“Evaṁ passaṁ …pe…
nāparaṁ itthattāyāti pajānātī”ti.
Sattamaṁ.