Reference Translation by Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0).
Sāvatthinidānaṁ.
At Sāvatthī.
“Kismiṁ nu kho, bhikkhave, sati, kiṁ upādāya, kiṁ abhinivissa evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjati:
“Mendicants, when what exists, because of grasping what and insisting on what, does the view arise:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’”ti?
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine’?”
Bhagavaṁmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā …pe…
“Our teachings are rooted in the Buddha. …”
“rūpe kho, bhikkhave, sati, rūpaṁ upādāya, rūpaṁ abhinivissa evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjati:
“When form exists, because of grasping form and insisting on form, the view arises:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’ti.
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine.’
Vedanāya sati …
When feeling …
saññāya sati …
perception …
saṅkhāresu sati …
choices …
viññāṇe sati, viññāṇaṁ upādāya, viññāṇaṁ abhinivissa, evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjati:
consciousness exists, because of grasping consciousness and insisting on consciousness, the view arises:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’ti.
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine.’
Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave,
What do you think, mendicants?
rūpaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
Is form permanent or impermanent?”
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, api nu taṁ anupādāya evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjeyya:
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would the view arise:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’”ti?
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine’?”
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“Vedanā …
“Is feeling …
saññā …
perception …
saṅkhārā …
choices …
viññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
consciousness permanent or impermanent?”
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.”
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Suffering, sir.”
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, api nu taṁ anupādāya evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjeyya:
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would the view arise:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’”ti?
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine’?”
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“Evaṁ passaṁ …pe…
“Seeing this …
nāparaṁ itthattāyāti pajānātī”ti.
They understand: ‘… there is nothing further for this place.’”
Catutthaṁ.
Reference Translation by Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0).
At Sāvatthī.
“Mendicants, when what exists, because of grasping what and insisting on what, does the view arise:
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine’?”
“Our teachings are rooted in the Buddha. …”
“When form exists, because of grasping form and insisting on form, the view arises:
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine.’
When feeling …
perception …
choices …
consciousness exists, because of grasping consciousness and insisting on consciousness, the view arises:
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine.’
What do you think, mendicants?
Is form permanent or impermanent?”
“Impermanent, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“Suffering, sir.”
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would the view arise:
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine’?”
“No, sir.”
“Is feeling …
perception …
choices …
consciousness permanent or impermanent?”
“Impermanent, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“Suffering, sir.”
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would the view arise:
‘I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine’?”
“No, sir.”
“Seeing this …
They understand: ‘… there is nothing further for this place.’”
Sāvatthinidānaṁ.
“Kismiṁ nu kho, bhikkhave, sati, kiṁ upādāya, kiṁ abhinivissa evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjati:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’”ti?
Bhagavaṁmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā …pe…
“rūpe kho, bhikkhave, sati, rūpaṁ upādāya, rūpaṁ abhinivissa evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjati:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’ti.
Vedanāya sati …
saññāya sati …
saṅkhāresu sati …
viññāṇe sati, viññāṇaṁ upādāya, viññāṇaṁ abhinivissa, evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjati:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’ti.
Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave,
rūpaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, api nu taṁ anupādāya evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjeyya:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’”ti?
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“Vedanā …
saññā …
saṅkhārā …
viññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vā taṁ sukhaṁ vā”ti?
“Dukkhaṁ, bhante”.
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ dukkhaṁ vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, api nu taṁ anupādāya evaṁ diṭṭhi uppajjeyya:
‘no cassaṁ, no ca me siyā, nābhavissa, na me bhavissatī’”ti?
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“Evaṁ passaṁ …pe…
nāparaṁ itthattāyāti pajānātī”ti.
Catutthaṁ.